Michael Jackson: The Man In The Mirror
June 30, 2009
“I didn’t want to leave this world without knowing who my descendant was. Thank you Michael!” Fred Astaire (shortly before his death)
“The only male singer who I’ve seen besides myself and who’s better than me — that is Michael Jackson.” Frank Sinatra

Michael Jackson died unexpectedly on Thursday, June 25. The suddenness of his death came as a source of shock to all.
Some have used the occasion to present a contemptibly narrow view of his personal struggles. But as the months and years roll by, it is the contribution of his musical genius that will be written permanently in the hearts and minds of people everywhere. Even now, the greatest of his peers have recognized him as one of the most gifted and accomplished musical artists of the last century. Read the rest of this entry »
The Death Mask of War – I
June 10, 2009Abu Ghraib is an epitome of torture and abuse. Its very mention awakens passions of horror, anger, and sorrow. It brings to mind a tragic affair in which the United States: 1) failed to uphold its commitment to the dignity of the person; 2) reneged on its constitutional and living obligations to civil liberties; and 3) acted in a willful manner to contravene the Geneva Conventions.
Indeed, Abu Ghraib stands as a shameful chapter in our national history. It will long be etched in the world’s memory as a time and place in which fear tore the fabric of American principle, tradition, and law, and drove the U.S. to enlist expediency as a rationale to forsake solemn international covenants. Abu Ghraib deserves to be lifted up as a symbol of evil and renounced as such by all succeeding generations.
Just as troubling, however, are the affronts to personal dignity oftentimes committed by U.S. soldiers in the field. Such abuses have been especially widespread in operations located in and around the urban centers of Iraq.
Until recently, stories about the terrifying treatment of Iraqi civilians by U.S. military personnel have gone unreported or been hidden from public scrutiny. It is as though such acts did not exist or that they did not matter. But now they are coming to light. What they reveal is an emotional intoxication and a pattern of callous behavior that flows necessarily from the logic of urban warfare. These acts, aside from being ethically flawed, call into question the essentials of America’s war-fighting strategy in Iraq. Read the rest of this entry »
Frank Schaeffer Blasts Extremist Language
June 2, 2009On May 31, Dr. George Tiller was gunned down while serving as an usher at the Reformation Lutheran Church he attended in Wichita, Kansas. Dr. Tiller, who ran an abortion clinic that performed late term abortions, had been the target of violent extremists for many years. On August 19, 1993, he was shot in both arms by Shelley Shannon. She received an eleven year prison sentence for the crime. This past Sunday he was killed.
Frank Schaeffer, along with his father (the late Francis Schaeffer), Pat Robertson, the late Jerry Falwell, and Dr. C. Evert Koop (Surgeon-General in the Reagan Administration) helped found the Religious Right. One of the hallmarks of this movement became the radicalization of speech.
In 1982, Frank’s father (Francis Schaeffer) wrote a book called A Christian Manifesto in which he called for the use of force if all other means of stopping abortion failed. He compared the United States and its practice of legalized abortion to Hitler’s Germany and argued that whatever means might have removed Hitler could be used to stop abortion here. In 1984, Frank Schaeffer wrote A Time for Anger in which he argued the same point. His book became a national best seller with the help of the evangelical movement. Dr. James Dobson alone gave away 100,000 copies.
In an interview with Rachael Maddow on June 1, Mr. Schaeffer discusses the radicalization of language in the culture wars and the part it played in the pro-life movement. “Words have consequences,” he says. As language becomes more extreme, consequences become more extreme.
Schaeffer admits his own culpability in the death of Dr. Tiller and urges other leaders in the Religious Right to come forth and do so too. His comments follow:
The Spirituality of Youth Violence – III
April 23, 2009III – Mechanistic Strategies and Research Methodologies: An Indifference to Spiritual Interiority
Immediately after World War II, the principle threats to the health status of America’s youth came from infectious diseases. Polio, diphtheria, measles, chicken pox, and whooping cough – each struck fear in the hearts of parents. But over time those threats receded. Polio is gone. Diphtheria is gone. Measles, chicken pox, and whooping cough are at an all time low. Indeed, for all practical purposes, yesterday’s battles have been won. But, they could well have been lost had we not identified the root cause of those diseases and developed vaccines that could prevent their occurrence.
Today, America’s youth faces an entirely new set of health threats: emotional distress, suicide, violence, substance abuse, and risky sexual behaviors. Youth violence is especially troubling because of the highly-charged attention it has received.
Yet, having developed over the years a myriad of programs to treat the consequences of such behaviors – analogous to the treatment of infectious diseases prior to the development of preventive vaccines – we still know very little about their root cause. This explains why we have been unable to develop an effective national strategy to prevent them. Effective prevention depends on a knowledge of root cause. Read the rest of this entry »
The Spirituality of Youth Violence – II
April 21, 2009II — The Critical Juncture: An Indifference to Spiritual Interiority
Indifference or reconciliation. The choice is ours to make.
Yet, such choices are often perplexing, ranging as they do through the murky depths of the human psyche. They easily befuddle the most astute observer and tend to dishearten those inclined to reconcile.
But apart from presenting confusion and discouragement, what makes an understanding of this choice so difficult is the use of the term indifference. To most, indifference implies a moral deficiency relative to another person, such as a want of concern or caring for them.
Not surprisingly, most parents would deny any such assertion. Few would admit they are indifferent toward their children. Most parents have strong feelings of love for them and this love is a powerful testimony against any allegation of indifference. Given this, it would seem that the disjunctive proposition — indifference or reconciliation — holds little, or no, promise for deepening our understanding of the causal dynamics of youth violence.
But before dismissing the term indifference altogether, it is well to remember that it has a logical meaning which transcends the moral sensibility and commitment to caring. Read the rest of this entry »
The Spirituality of Youth Violence – I
April 20, 2009It happened ten years ago today.
At 11:10 a.m. on Tuesday, April 20th, 1999, gunshots rang out from Columbine High School killing twelve students, a teacher, and both assailants. This act reverberated across the land like a mighty thunderclap. It sounded a terror-laden warning. It awakened in countless individuals, families, and communities a truth forgotten, a vulnerability denied, and an anguish concealed. Time stopped as hearts and minds resonated with the harsh moments of that mournful event.
No doubt. Columbine sent tremors of fear across the nation. Like a peaceful sunlit meadow suddenly overrun by a raging mountain storm, the tranquility of trust was replaced by the wrenching uncertainty of distrust. Existential angst seeped into our national consciousness. We asked with uncertain expectation what dreadful journey led Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold to tear the social fabric and tear it so hideously. We became fearful of what was going on in our own neighborhoods, in our own families, and with our own children. We became suspicious of our children’s actions and our children’s friends. We became frightful of the tribute that might accompany their attendance at school. We wondered about our children’s exposure and our powerlessness to intercede on their behalf. We worried about the unknown and the brutal forces that range beyond our control. We asked “what next?” as we braced ourselves for another round of violence.
Read the rest of this entry »
Frank Schaeffer: On the Republican Party
March 10, 2009The following interview with Frank Schaeffer is offered without comment.
Negro Spirituals: “Just the Black Notes”
April 20, 2008Wintley Phipps, the president of the US Dream Academy, offers a rendition of Amazing Grace that simply overwhelms the imagination. It’s unforgettable.
The US Dream Academy is a non-profit organization whose purpose is to help and inspire children whose misfortune is to have family members in prison.
Watch this inspiring video:
Obama: “A More Perfect Union”
March 18, 2008
In Philadelphia today, Senator Barack Obama delivered what is perhaps the most important political speech on race since Martin Luther King gave his I Have A Dream speech on the Mall in Washington, D.C. 45 years ago.
Obama’s speech is entitled A More Perfect Union. Watch it:
Frank Schaeffer Decries Double Standard
March 17, 2008Obama’s Minister Committed “Treason” But When My Father Said the Same Thing He Was a Republican Hero
by Frank Schaeffer
“When Senator Obama’s preacher thundered about racism and injustice Obama suffered smear-by-association. But when my late father — Religious Right leader Francis Schaeffer — denounced America and even called for the violent overthrow of the US government, he was invited to lunch with presidents Ford, Reagan and Bush, Sr.
“Every Sunday thousands of right wing white preachers (following in my father’s footsteps) rail against America’s sins from tens of thousands of pulpits. They tell us that America is complicit in the “murder of the unborn,” has become “Sodom” by coddling gays, and that our public schools are sinful places full of evolutionists and sex educators hell-bent on corrupting children. They say, as my dad often did, that we are, “under the judgment of God.” They call America evil and warn of immanent destruction. By comparison Obama’s minister’s shouted “controversial” comments were mild. All he said was that God should damn America for our racism and violence and that no one had ever used the N-word about Hillary Clinton.
African Immigrant Speaks About America
February 12, 2008Derrick gained national attention the other day when he responded to a reporters question about why he supported Barack Obama. The reporter’s original intent was to show Obama’s supporters as dreamy and without substance. But Derrick confounded the reporter. Instead of gushing emotion, Derrick elaborated in great detail the respective positions of Obama and Clinton on health care, setting forth why he favored Obama’s plan over Clinton’s.
Now Derrick has posted his own video on YouTube to explain what the presidential election means to him as an immigrant coming from West Africa. His story is a powerful illustration of what America means to people around the world.
Since coming to the US, Derrick has become a naturalized American citizen. His comments are a good reminder of the love and esteem the world holds for this country. Even with our failings, America is still the “world’s dream.”
Frank Schaeffer: Pro-Life, Pro-Obama
February 8, 2008
Francis August Schaeffer (1912-1984), an American Evangelical Christian theologian, is most famous for his theological writings and the establishment of the L’Abri community in Switzerland. But in the late 1970s and early 1980s, he was a major catalyst that sparked a return to political activism among American Protestant evangelicals and fundamentalists, particularly in relation to the issue of abortion.
His son, Frank Schaeffer, helped broker an alliance between his father (Francis) and Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, James Dobson and other religious leaders. This alliance came to be known as the Religious Right.
Frank has since concluded, however, that these tele-evangelists “stars” were intellectually inferior and theologically sleazy, referring to them archly as “cobelligerents.”
In his book, Crazy for God, Schaeffer concludes that, “We will never find a ‘good’ solution to the question of abortion.”
In an editorial published only yesterday, Schaeffer explains why he is pro-life and pro-Obama.
Super Tuesday: Obama Forges On
February 6, 2008
Obama had an impressive run last night. I suspect he’ll be able to capitalize on the momentum factor in the weeks ahead. It’ll be interesting to watch. As he said last night: “We’re the one’s we’ve been looking for!” — an old Hopi Indian phrase. People are beginning to believe he just might be right. “Yes, we can!”
Maryland and Washington, D.C. are up to bat very soon, as is Virginia (Nov. 12). The TV spots have been running for days.
Since South Carolina, Hillary appears reluctant to use the traditional Clinton “break the kneecap with a ten pound hammer” style politics. Perhaps the Clinton team feels they’ve been outed in that department. Yet that’s her strength — nasty politics. Hmmmmm! One wonders. Maybe Obama has already begun to change her? Where’s that fire breathing dragon? Has her brand of politics taken a hit? Is she a victim of her own “politics of fear”?
Pat Buchanan this morning said McCain would make Cheney look like Ghandi! Rather poignant statement. McCain has a big ego and temper. From an advisor’s perspective, I would take that to mean he’d soon become isolated in the White House. Not good for McCain. Not good for America.
Obama seems willing and able to exchange ideas and strategies. To me, that’s everything. The secret of compromise is that it allows dialogue to enrich the final concrete outcome. Inability to compromise indicates a detachment, an abstraction, from reality. Ideological politics reduces everything it touches to ideological engagement. Problems remain unresolved. Passions dominate.
Ideological politics is what we’ve been living with since McGovern took over the Democratic party and the Fundamentalists took over the Republican Party beginning with the rise of Newt Gingrich. Hopefully, the pragmatic center is seeing its own resurrection. I’d like to see the day when the terms “conservative” and “liberal” have died a peaceful death. For too long they have been mere slogans overburdened with emotive content. Intrinsically, both terms are meaningless. Let’s once again address problems pragmatically and do it against the backdrop of a sound vision for America.
Caroline Kennedy Endorses Obama
January 27, 2008
Caroline Kennedy, writing in the New York Times, has endorsed Senator Barack Obama for President. In an article entitled A President Like My Father, she said:
“I want a president who understands that his responsibility is to articulate a vision and encourage others to achieve it; who holds himself, and those around him, to the highest ethical standards; who appeals to the hopes of those who still believe in the American Dream, and those around the world who still believe in the American ideal; and who can lift our spirits, and make us believe again that our country needs every one of us to get involved.
“I have never had a president who inspired me the way people tell me that my father inspired them. But for the first time, I believe I have found the man who could be that president — not just for me, but for a new generation of Americans.”
Obama’s campaign calls the American people to rally behind a “change we can believe in.” But already, he is bringing change to America. Since announcing his candidacy a year ago, Obama has gently reminded us that there is a better way than what we’ve become accustomed to over these many years. He urges the American people to a higher destiny, a higher aspiration than self-interest.
Nearly a half century ago, in speech after speech, Kennedy cried out with a staccato-spoken voice: “I think we can do better.” He believed we could. And in thoughtful moments so did we. Today, Obama echoes that same cry. He urges us to to the great challenges ahead. He says: “Yes, we can! Si, se puede!“
MLK: Letter From Birmingham Jail
January 21, 2008
On April 16, 1963, Martin Luther King, Jr. released an open letter written from the city jail in Birmingham, Alabama. This letter was in response to a public statement issued by eight white Alabama clergymen on April 12, 1963 entitled “A Call for Unity.” In their statement, they agreed that social injustices were being committed but emphasized that the battle against racial segregation should be fought in the courts and not taken to the streets.
King responded four days later. He said that without direct action the goal of civil rights could never be achieved. “Wait“, he argued, has almost always meant “Never.” He further argued that civil disobedience is justified when a people are confronted by unjust laws. Indeed, “one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” … “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
On this day, a day which is dedicated to the memory of Dr. King, I have decided to publish his Letter from Birmingham Jail in its entirety. The text follows after the break:
Obama: On Toughness and Success in Politics
December 22, 2007
Recently on NPR Radio’s All Things Considered [Trusted Advisor Recounts Obama's Evolution], David Axelrod, chief strategist for Senator Barack Obama, was asked whether Obama was ‘tough enough’ to win the presidency. Echoing doubts about Obama’s toughness, the show’s host, Michelle Norris, said: “Success in politics sometimes, in fact often, means having to close your eyes or even hold your nose and do something you might not like to do but have to do if you keep your eye on the ball.”
Axelrod replied: “Well, that’s an interesting question. Maybe we’ll test the proposition.” … “I believe he [Obama] has the ability to make a very tough case on behalf of the things he cares about, and he’ll fight very hard for them. You’re asking a different question, though, which is: Does he have the ability to be underhanded, will he pull the trigger on the gratuitous negative shot you often see in politics. The answer to that is probably no.”
“I don’t think that [being underhanded] is toughness,” Axelrod said. “I think that’s something he’s committed not to do. The question is: What does the country want right now? Do they want to continue the kind of politics we’ve had that’s led us to the morass we’re in? Or, do they want someone who can really lift us, bring us together and, as Lincoln said, fulfill the better angels of our nature and move this country forward? We’ll soon find out the answer to that question.”
David Axelrod’s comments are right on the mark.
Obama does not have to sell his soul to get ahead in politics. No one does. Indeed, the deepest truth of politics is quite the opposite from what is too often presumed to be so. Politics is not dark and dirty by nature. It is what we choose to make it. But only a noble soul can unleash a noble politics.
The Concreteness of Spirituality
October 23, 2007No one in America, or so it seems, can escape the ubiquitous impact of cynicism and distrust, violence and fear, intemperance and injustice, and the isolation and aloneness that ravages so much of our national life. Statistics on homelessness, substance abuse, youth violence, corruption within the family, and the litany of social and economic inequities have long told this tale but only through numbers.
Yet lurking in the shadows lies the specter of the autonomous individual. Anthropological atomism is embedded in American culture, and it acts as the wellspring of a spiritual alienation that rages unabated like a firestorm across the land. Its alluring dynamic fragments and distorts the nation’s institutions. It corrupts the lives of present and future generations. In every respect, its impact constitutes a serious intellectual, moral, and cultural challenge to an integral America.
Posted by Gerald L. Campbell
Posted by Gerald L. Campbell
Posted by Gerald L. Campbell 

