August 31, 2010
I’ll start with politics this morning. There are three races I’m watching: California, Kentucky, and Nevada. Presently, Boxer is leading in polling in CA, Paul is leading in KY, and Reid is even with Angle in NV. The GOP needs to pull 2 of 3 to have a chance at retaking the Senate. If they pull 3 of 3, the GOP will most definitely retake the Senate. My intuition is the GOP wins 1 of 3. The House will follow a similar dynamic, but be easier for the GOP to reclaim. I don’t believe it is a given that the GOP will reclaim the House, but I’m not surprised that people are pushing for that expectation. I think the generic ballot is deceiving a lot of people due to the GOP’s enormous edge in the South that is bringing up the national numbers.
Since I’m bored at the moment, I’ll go ahead and analyze all the Senate contested races. Read the rest of this entry »
6 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
August 5, 2010
“The liberal case against gay marriage” is an article in the Summer 2004 issue of The Public Interest by Susan M. Shell. While I don’t expect universal agreement with it, I’m curious what our readers think of the article.
For those wishing to comment, I’m not interested in what you think about Same Sex Marriage. I’m interested in what you think of Shell’s arguments.
10 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
August 4, 2010
Often those of us who make mistakes are reticent to admit them publicly. Unfortunately what results is that people are misled. Today, I wish to confess that I went to a for-profit diploma mill. I graduated from there in 2001 with an Associate’s Degree in Information Technology. There were red flags from the beginning. I had the option of continuing my investment for another year and earning a bachelor’s degree. I declined to do so for a number of reasons, some personal. One of the reasons I declined to do so was that it was apparent at that point that the degree was not going to offer any more street cred.
People shouldn’t get too wrapped up in education getting you a job. At its minimum, it is a ticket in the door, although the value of that ticket shouldn’t be underestimated. At its best, it, particularly vocation education, provides a path to understanding present and future technologies. Having said that, education does have value for its own sake. That is true in direct and indirect ways in regards to potential careers. Nothing can replace the value of a good theoretical education. While it is of course possible to get a good education outside of a traditional university, it takes significantly longer, takes more effort, and requires significant discipline in order to do so. There are no shortcuts in life. As one of the many IT professionals flooded into the market, I found myself in a professional dead end. I will hopefully have my bachelor’s degree in two years from a real university in a more traditional educational area offering real potential career avenues. Your time is valuable. Don’t waste it in a for profit diploma mill.
1 Comment |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
July 28, 2010
Property is one of those things that should be simple enough to discuss. The tendency though is to define it. And once it is defined, the tendency is to treat the definition as immutable. Property however isn’t a simple thing. It is a social construct.
To start, let’s take a simple example. George has been working at a factory for 15 years. XYZ corporation decides that George is too old. They take George’s job and give it to Larry. Other than age, there is no change in compensation scheme or ability. Was George the victim of an unjust taking? In the present generation, most would say no. An older generation may have argued that XYZ corporation has a duty not to arbitrarily and capriciously remove George from his position. They would have argued that perhaps giving George’s job to Larry could have been justified were Larry significantly more skilled or seeking significantly less compensation. On what basis would they argued that George was mistreated? They would have argued that taking away George’s livelihood presents a significant cost to George and his family. They would have argued that those costs could reverberate to the whole community. While some will surely doubt me here, we have already legally proscribed many similar things. For example, it is illegal to fire a woman for getting pregnant. We have banned age discrimination. In many ways a man’s work is his property. Read the rest of this entry »
1 Comment |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
July 15, 2010
As is the case with FEHB plans currently, and with the Affordable Care Act and the President’s related Executive Order more generally, in Pennsylvania and in all other states abortions will not be covered in the Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) except in the cases of rape or incest, or where the life of the woman would be endangered. – Department of Health and Human Services (emphasis added for those with difficulty reading a full sentence.)
This statement has been released for over 12 hours now. It has been linked from this site for that length of time. Yet if you go around the Catholic blogosphere, you still have people repeating NRLC’s speculative and now proven erroneous analysis. While it is understandable that many of these places ran with this speculation, there is no good excuse for them not to have informed their readers of the truth.
Lifesite of course has not corrected their initial story, nor have they found HHS’s statement newsworthy.
CNA ran with the story, but at least noted that it was critics making the claim. (This is not the USCCB’s media arm.) They have not found HHS’s statement newsworthy.
Father Zuhlsdorf has run with the story and found his readers aren’t worthy of knowing the truth.
Jimmy Akin of the National Catholic Register doesn’t believe his readers are worthy of knowing the truth.
The American Catholic doesn’t fail to keep its readers ignorant. (Update 9:46: Blackadder of The American Catholic notes HHS release and responds.)
There are a myriad of other sites that don’t respect their readers. (All claims are accurate as of this writing. It is my hope that places actually do correct their misinformation.)
Minor Update: A lot of sites have reported that the Obama administration is “officially” supporting abortion now when they made their accusations. Obama does “officially” support abortion rights. His campaign website noted this. However, when the controlling agencies, in this case HHS and PA, specifically deny a proffered interpretation (and they have done so from the start), it is intellectually dishonest to claim the agencies are officially supporting a policy. Official is a first party determination, not a third party one.
50 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
July 2, 2010
The House of Representatives approved another bill yesterday attempting to restore expiring unemployment benefits. The Senate still cannot get a bill passed. Those voting against in the House are here. Republicans are in italics. Independents are underlined. In the Wisconsin delegation, Paul Ryan and Jim Sensenbrenner voted against the bill. Paul Ryan has a closed GM plant in his district. Janesville’s unemployment rate is 10.4%, down from 12.8% in April.
Aderholt
Akin
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Baird
Barrett (SC)
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Berry
Biggert
Blackburn
Blunt
Boehner
Bonner
Boozman
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Bright
Broun (GA)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Buchanan
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Cantor
Carter
Cassidy
Chaffetz
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Cooper
Crenshaw
Culberson
Davis (KY)
Djou
Dreier
Duncan
Emerson
Fallin
Flake
Fleming
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Griffith
Guthrie
Hall (TX)
Harper
Hastings (WA)
Hensarling
Herger
Hill
Hunter
Inglis
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson, Sam
Jordan (OH)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirk
Kline (MN)
Lamborn
Lance
Latham
Latta
Lee (NY)
Lewis (CA)
Linder
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Marchant
Markey (CO)
Marshall
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McMorris Rodgers Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Minnick
Moran (KS)
Myrick
Neugebauer
Nunes
Nye
Olson
Paul
Paulsen
Pence
Pitts
Poe (TX)
Price (GA)
Putnam
Rehberg
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rohrabacher
Rooney
Roskam
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schmidt
Schock
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (NE)
Smith (TX)
Stearns
Sullivan
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Walden
Westmoreland
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
33 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
June 9, 2010
Honda resolved a two-week strike at a transmission plant in southern China by offering 1,900 workers there raises of 24 to 32 percent.
But the success of that walkout, which ended a week ago, seems to have prompted additional strikes at a time when workers in China are awakening to the idea of collective bargaining and demanding higher wages.
New York Times
This is just terrible news. This means that some capitalist will be forced to suffer and might have to walk his own dog rather than employing the services of a dog walker. It will also make the workers lazy and unproductive. Does China really want to look like Detroit? When will people learn that socialism is wrong?
4 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
May 28, 2010
The Ochlophobist is a convert to Orthodoxy. He isn’t hesitant to criticize the Americanization of Orthodoxy. Here he addresses it with Catholicism, using as his foil Fr. Jay Scott Newman’s piece on Evangelical Catholicism. A brief tease:
The religious psychology behind the “personal relationship with the Lord Jesus” is among the most interesting religious phenomena in modernity. The notion of the “personal relationship with the Lord Jesus” asserts an unmediated personal relationship between the believer and Jesus, but as we have seen this relationship is in fact mediated via a host of rituals and ritual language. Yet, like the Quaker whose Quaker meetings follow a near exact routine 99.8% of the time, we have a religious psychology here which fervently expresses an intention to deny the role of any ritual in mediating the relationship between the believer and Jesus (in the case of Evangelical Catholicism and Byzantine Rite Evangelicalism the stress is put on the ritual only rightly existing for those who have this Evangelical approach to the faith, as we will see below, and the inference that the ritual cannot be approached rightly unless the ‘heart work’ is done first — there is some truth to this, of course; God save us from things that have some truth). In classic evangelicalism this anti-ritual intent is indeed ritually expressed, such as the mention, frequent and routine, in services of how one cannot be saved via rituals, and a whole sub-lingo of anti-ritualism, the repetitive use of which in religious services is itself ritualistic. In those cases where Evangelicalism has been imported into Catholicism or Orthodoxy there is not an overt anti-ritualism, but there remains either a soft assertion or a clear enough inference that the unmediated “Gospel” oriented “personal relationship with the Lord Jesus” soteriologically precedes the role of ritual acts in mediating God to man. Beyond the anti-ritual aspects of this religious psychology, there is the positive assertion and/or intuition that to engage in these deemed non-ritual ritual acts of the “personal relationship with the Lord Jesus” is to actually engage directly with the Lord Jesus. Oftentimes this is sad yet humourous. So often when you listen to the prayers of a person who has a “personal relationship with the Lord Jesus” you find that the content of those prayers consists mostly of assertions to (reminders to) Jesus of Who He is, which, of course, inevitably mimics the conceptualization of Jesus that the believer (and usually his community of believers) wants Jesus to be, and this form of prayer essentially serves to convince the believer that he or she has a “personal relationship with the Lord Jesus” by means of the mental and emotional construction of a Jesus whom the believer “relates” to by way of those acts which construct said Jesus. Does this sound circular? It is.
8 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
May 23, 2010
I’m not going to have much to add here. I figured I’d add some speculations.
1. Abortion is typically an outpatient procedure. This isn’t South America. Catholic hospitals don’t need to create excuses for performing abortions. If a person wants to have an abortion in this country, there are facilities that will perform them, no questions asked. The fact that the person who had the abortion was inpatient and approval had to be sought by a committee should be sufficient evidence that immediate medical conditions required prompt action. “News” sources that speculate contrariwise are acting irresponsibly unless they have solid evidence. If they quote a doctor claiming such circumstances never present themselves and from that he renders judgment in a case he has not reviewed, the doctor is committing professional malfeasance. Read the rest of this entry »
60 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
May 6, 2010
One of the distressing things about being on Facebook is seeing what people think. There is a gross hostility to Mexicans in particular and Hispanics in general. People will claim that their hostility only extends to illegal immigrants, but that is nonsense. In my area, we have a number of Laotian (Hmong) refugees. For those unfamiliar, this traces itself to the Vietnam War. While the immigrants have made significant progress economically, I don’t believe members of the Hmong community would consider themselves significantly welcome in Wisconsin, despite our witnessing the 2nd generation coming of age now.
While one can understand that communities tend to be closed and as a consequence outsiders don’t perceive themselves as welcome, this doesn’t make a whole lot of sense in the cases of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California vis-a-vis Mexico. Read the rest of this entry »
16 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
April 20, 2010
I’m hesitant to write this kind of post. In the first instance, it will be seen as defense of the church. Some will even see it as a defense of sexual predators. There are a lot of assumptions about sexual abuse, and they carry over into our everyday conversations. To start, I’m going to just give some basic facts. These numbers are from the CDC.
- Among high school students, 8% are reported to have been forced to have sex. In other words, they were raped. By gender, the breakdown is 11% of females and 5% of males. To put that in perspective, I go to a fairly large parish where a mass will have 500 people. So at any mass, I will likely be with 40 rapes victims, roughly 28 female and 12 male.
- 1 in 6 women and 1 in 33 men have reported an attempted or completed rape in their lives. At my parish mass, this would translate to 42 women and 8 men. (These are two different surveys which is why in part there is a discrepancy between 1 and 2. CDC is citing DOJ numbers here.) These are just reported cases.
Another web site is Darkness to Light, which has a reference section that appears reputable. Read the rest of this entry »
33 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
April 10, 2010
I don’t know how I got the celebrity beat at Vox Nova, but for whatever reason I always find what seems to me to be an interesting wrinkle in parts of our pop culture. Over the past few months or so, the world has been buzzing about golfer Tiger Woods. Words like redemption and greatness are thrown around.
I was at a small social gathering several weeks ago, and the topic of Tiger Woods came up. The host pondered whether we should forgive Tiger and forget his indiscretions. I never really felt a personal obligation in that regard. I stated simply that the guy was scum for what he did. I know, little old judgmental me. The host in fact offered that Tiger Woods had opportunities and pressures that more easily facilitated rampant infidelity. After close to a decade of marriage, I know that one doesn’t have to be Tiger Woods to cheat. Having worked in a couple of hotels and driven a taxi cab, I’m well aware of the stuff needed to cheat: the ability to fog a mirror is a good start, but I’m not even sure that’s required. Well, the host acknowledged the low barriers to entry for an aspiring adulterer. He then went on to exhort that one must acknowledge Woods’s greatness on the golf course. Read the rest of this entry »
6 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
March 26, 2010
[March 24]‘s front-page story in the New York Times suggests that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), under the direction of then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, failed to act against a Wisconsin priest who was accused of molesting scores of boys at a school for the deaf.
Is the story damaging? Yes. Should the Vatican have acted faster? Yes. Should the accused priest have been laicized? In all probability, Yes again.
Lawler’s story is here. He goes on to list several points that I would encourage you to read. Read the rest of this entry »
18 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
March 16, 2010
When Father Z offers one of his thrice daily prayers to Denver, his followers go a little crazy:
How dare he place covering immigrants on the same moral level as abortion. — Heather
You make a good point, Heather.
And honestly, I don’t know when the Church has ever approved of Socialism,where what belongs to the haves is stolen to give to the have-nots. — kat
And those are just the first two comments. More entertainment ensues. What is made blindingly clear is that these folks don’t care about the uninsured …
.. and they really don’t care about abortion either.
19 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
February 19, 2010
As I stated in my previous post, defenders of torture are removing the ticking time bomb from their defense. 5 years ago, plus or minus, those that wanted to remain respectable made a big deal about torture not being illicit in the case of a ticking time bomb. They did this in part to avoid having to defend each and every instance that our government used torture. In particular, the revelations of Abu Ghraib were fresh, and there was no need to defend what went on there, because the dominant narrative was that the acts resulted from individuals acting on their volitions. Additionally, an absolute prohibition of torture (or torture-like acts, since they didn’t wish to concede that what they were describing was torture) had the unpleasant effect of leaving us impotent in the face of very constrained scenarios. This condition has a long history of being shocking to American sensibilities as was shown when the Vatican wrote that they did not find embryo adoption to be the best solution to embryos leftover from IVF. It was generally conceded at the time that ticking time bombs would be exceptional, since they had the requirements both of immediate general knowledge and having a known conspirator in custody with immediate and specific knowledge. It was always conceded that raping the conspirator’s wife, for example, would be wrong in an effort to coerce a conspirator. Read the rest of this entry »
9 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
February 13, 2010
Several Catholic blogs have made comments that those opposed to torture are too shrill. We are claimed to be divisive. And the plain truth is that after at least a half decade of having our country commit torture, including to the point of having tortured people to death (obviously denied or otherwise attempted to be excused), many of us have difficulty seeing the good will of those who defend our country’s practices. Further, our country has clearly not limited its use of torture to the difficult case of a known and imminent threat, aka the ticking time bomb. And for all the alleged nuance of those supporting “enhanced interrogation”, we find such things as over half the country supporting the torture of Abdulmutallab, the underwear bomber, for the sadistic purpose of going on a fishing expedition, figuring he must have other information of use. In fact, Raymond Arroyo’s personal moral theologian on torture, Marc Thiessen, found President Obama’s unwillingness to use torture against Abdulmutallab to be negligent. Yes, this is the man that EWTN is hosting. This is the man whose voice needed to be aired – no, supportively promulgated – on the leading worldwide Catholic television station. Why not just offer a sympathetic platform to NARAL – Catholic for Choice would be too moderate – for crying out loud? There are times for moderation. This is not one of them. If EWTN wants to liberally support torture, that is its business. It has no business calling itself Catholic while doing it though.
15 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
December 17, 2009
Those familiar with my writing recognize that I tend to be more curmudgeonly around Christmas. Today I will enter the virtual confessional and confess that I have allowed myself to become lax in my own ideals.
When my Irish twins were under 4, they didn’t have toys of their own. The toys they had could be used by either child. Half a decade later or about 6 months ago, I instituted the rule banning fighting over items worth less then 50 cents. This rule does surprisingly need enforcement among the big kids, but it also sees enforcement with the presence of a 3-year-old. Needless to say, desire for property seems to be intrinsic to children as witnessed by the Toddler’s Creed. (A sample verse: “If I want it, it’s mine.”) Read the rest of this entry »
12 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.
November 30, 2009
Every now and then, people read a story and find significant a detail I find to be insignificant. This is one of those times. In this case, Maurice Clemmons stands accused of murdering four police officers in Washington, and the fact I find to be insignificant is that nine years ago he was granted clemency by then governor of Arkansas Mike Huckabee. The significant detail to me was that:
He was released from custody just six days ago, even though [sic] was staring at seven additional felony charges in Washington state.
The State of Washington felt $150,000 was adequate (in real terms to Clemmons, this meant $15,000) to secure their interests and the security of its people. However we are to believe that Mike Huckabee is to bear the burden for this act by granting clemency after a decade to a person who committed his crimes when he was just 17. Read the rest of this entry »
5 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by M.Z.