God Our Mother and 9/11
I’ve recently pulled together some references by recent popes to God as our Mother. My purpose for doing so is that for whatever reason, I’ve always been squeamish about referencing God as Mother, and so it has only been with some humility and struggle that I have come to accept the use of this image in prayer. I of course attribute no gender to God. God is neither male nor female. Also, according to the understanding of analogical concepts held by Catholic theology, God’s fatherhood is more dissimilar than similar to any concept of fatherhood, or motherhood for that matter, that we could ever have. But we happily call God a Rock, a Shield, and any number of other inanimate objects, so really, why not a woman? After all, in one of our favorite parables, Jesus compares God to a Good Shepherd. We often leave out that right before that in Luke 15 Jesus had just described God as a housewife. So here are some passages you may find useful.
One caveat: In “Jesus of Nazareth: Part I” by Benedict XVI, he cautions:
“The mystery of God’s maternal love is expressed with particular power in the Hebrew word rahamim. Etymologically, this word means ‘womb,’ but it was later used to mean divine compassion for man, God’s mercy…. it is nonetheless also true that God is never named or addressed as mother, either in the Old or in the New Testament. ’Mother’ in the Bible is an image but not at title for God….. mother is not used as a title or a form of address for God” (139-140).
He explains that this was probably the case since most of the mother goddesses of the ancient world evoked some kind of pantheism, and it was only the image of Father that fully allowed for the transcendent otherness of God revealed to Israel. At last that’s a guess. Still, we call God Rock, why not Mother? At this time, the distinction between image and title holds. It will be interesting to see if there is doctrinal development in this regard. So here are some great quotes:
John Paul II explains that the use of Abba
“points indirectly to the mystery of the eternal generating which belongs to the inner life of God. … this generating has neither masculine nor feminine qualities. … God is spirit and possesses no property typical of the body, neither feminine nor masculine. Thus even fatherhood in God is completely divine and free of the masculine bodily characteristics proper to human fatherhood.”
The word “Father” is used in an
“ultracorporeal, superhuman, and completely divine sense” (Mulieris Dignitatem §8).
The Catechism explains:
“God’s parental tenderness can also be expressed by the image of motherhood” (§239); and again, “In no way is God in man’s image. He is neither man nor woman. God is pure spirit in which there is no place for the difference between the sexes. But the respective ‘perfections’ of man and woman reflect something of the infinite perfection of God: those of a mother and those of a father and husband” (§370).
Pope John Paul I on the occasion of the Camp David peace talks taking place between Israeli and Palestinian representatives:
“God is our father. Even more God is our mother. God does not want to hurt us, but only to do good for us, all of us. If children are ill, they have additional claim to be loved by their mother. And we too, if by chance we are sick with badness and are on the wrong track, have yet another claim to be loved by the Lord. With a mother’s love the living God keeps vigil through the long night of war, trying everything to break the violent fever and bring about peace.”
And John Paul II again:
“The hands of God hold us up, they hold us tight, they give us strength. But at the same time they give us comfort, they console and caress us. They are the hands of a father and a mother at the same time…. The father who embraces his lost son is the definitive icon of God…. The merciful father of the parable has in himself …. all of the characteristics of fatherhood and motherhood. In embracing the son he shows the profile of a mother.”
Perhaps on this 10th memorial of September 11th, the words of John Paul I are particularly appropriate: “With a mother’s love the living God keeps vigil through the long night of war, trying everything to break the violent fever and bring about peace.” This image along with that of God’s compassion as a mother’s womb help us to recognize along with Bernard of Clairvaux that while God “cannot suffer, he can suffer with.” God suffers with his people, and he suffers with us today. Today in his compassion he attempts to bring to rebirth into eternal life through his womb all those who died on September 11, and today he keeps vigil like any mother watching over a sick and fevered child through a long night. Today God “suffers with.”
Like this:
Comments are closed.
Nathan, Gerald O’Collins states in “The TriPersonal God” that when speaking of ‘Father,’ the identification is valid only if aligned “with the meanings communicated by the biblical witnesses,” and only if the tendency to literalize is refused.
With that in mind, I think the sonner persons can overcome a “squeamishness” because of the feminine imagery that some find meaningfully attached to God, the better.
God is, after all, the origin and standard of both motherhood and fatherhood.
Quite true.
I guess I related even better to God Our Nana or God Our Bubbeh…with good grandparents, there’s a generosity of spirit and trust that often even the best of parents lack.
I recall hearing Thomas Berry reflecting on this question sometime about 30 years ago. He was convinced that the Hebrew people had lost something fundamentally essential in their understanding of God when they totally rejected anything which even hinted at the feminine in their relationship with the divine.
Consequently, Berry told us that with the Christian revelation about Mary as the bearer of God (Theotokos) that particular and essential aspect of our human understanding of the divine mystery was given a new perspective.
I believe that we will certainly see some development of doctrine along these lines.
There’s some pretty remarkable nuance coming from the popes here, and I think they are very often better at that than they get credit for (whether by defenders or detractors). It’s kind of a relief to see them basically rising above the whole absurd divine gender debate. That’s not the kind of thing I usually like to think about a lot because it gets blown out of proportion, but I agree with the basic points here: the distinction between image and title, while holding onto the image where it’s helpful, and the “ultracorporeal” transcendence of the “Father” title. I often wish we could just all get this and move on to more important matters, but I know it’s a bigger issue for some people.
I can see a certain “projection” going on amongst Catholics who are a bit wimpy. If St. Paul who calls the female sex, the weaker sex, how does God who is all powerful, and Almighty, have anything to do with being ‘weak’?
God is not mother. I’m sorry. I know you guys don’t like me and I don’t fathom you people.
Wimpiness sounds more like a pagan Greek than Christian perspective. The kind of concern Nietzsche had….
Where does Paul call women “weaker?”
What do you make of John Paul I’s comment?
“Gen 1:27 “And God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.”
If you break that down, God created man (here man clearly means human) in his image..If Adam and Eve are created in his image, then God encompasses both male and female…GOD IS…
Interesting thing though, if God created humanity in his image, why is it that Eve is so often depicted as being the cause of Adam’s downfall? She offered him the fruit, he exercised free will, and chose to partake. The operative term being “chose”. And the Church seems to lump women into 2 categories in practice and attitude, that of “Mother” (Mary) or “seductress” (Eve). To me this explains why individuals such as wlindsaywheeler above have such a difficult time with God encompassing the female or “mother” aspect.
They like to forget that the Spirit is active in women as well, and not just in “mother” figures. How many of the female Saints or even the 3 female Doctors of the Chuch would you consider “weak”?