<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Zizek from the AAR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vox-nova.com/2009/11/12/more-zizek-from-the-aar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/11/12/more-zizek-from-the-aar/</link>
	<description>Catholic perspectives on culture, society, and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Karlson</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/11/12/more-zizek-from-the-aar/#comment-67091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry Karlson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=10909#comment-67091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As always, Zizek offers interesting, and even, odd interpretations; some of what he says I think is on to something of value, some I think Christians need to respond to (his Hegelian death of God interpretation needs to be met head on). But one of the things I find valuable is that he really does want to engage Christians, not dismiss them, and he often finds the arguments of his fellow atheists extremely shallow (after all, he thinks it is Christianity which has allowed for atheism in the modern world because of its idea of the incarnation).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, Zizek offers interesting, and even, odd interpretations; some of what he says I think is on to something of value, some I think Christians need to respond to (his Hegelian death of God interpretation needs to be met head on). But one of the things I find valuable is that he really does want to engage Christians, not dismiss them, and he often finds the arguments of his fellow atheists extremely shallow (after all, he thinks it is Christianity which has allowed for atheism in the modern world because of its idea of the incarnation).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

