<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religious Hermeneutics at Comedy Central</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vox-nova.com/2009/10/14/religious-hermeneutics-at-comedy-central/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/10/14/religious-hermeneutics-at-comedy-central/</link>
	<description>Catholic perspectives on culture, society, and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:03:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Raber</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/10/14/religious-hermeneutics-at-comedy-central/#comment-65626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Raber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=10501#comment-65626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Does the cross have an essentially religious meaning or is its religious significance merely historical?&quot;

It is hard to say what meaning the cross or crucifix has to people, for example, who are not Christians in any committed sense (or perhaps in no sense at all) who wear it as jewelry.  Perhaps it is has no more meaning than any other fashion item.

Perhaps the only significance that remains in this signifier (in the thoroughly secularized part of our culture) is its historicity itself, its character as a piece of tradition, part of a style vocabulary we have received from our forebears, something like the classical orders of columns in architecture.

Then we can ask to what extent the cross has ever been understood in its full meaning right within the Church--whose leaders and members have always and everywhere more or less compromised with the ways of &quot;the world.&quot;  To what extent do we regard &quot;Christian&quot; or &quot;Catholic&quot; as not much more than the label of our tribe, a banner over our heads, as indeed the name of a personal style--as a signifier with at best a weak signification in the direction of taking up our cross and actually following Jesus?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Does the cross have an essentially religious meaning or is its religious significance merely historical?&#8221;</p>
<p>It is hard to say what meaning the cross or crucifix has to people, for example, who are not Christians in any committed sense (or perhaps in no sense at all) who wear it as jewelry.  Perhaps it is has no more meaning than any other fashion item.</p>
<p>Perhaps the only significance that remains in this signifier (in the thoroughly secularized part of our culture) is its historicity itself, its character as a piece of tradition, part of a style vocabulary we have received from our forebears, something like the classical orders of columns in architecture.</p>
<p>Then we can ask to what extent the cross has ever been understood in its full meaning right within the Church&#8211;whose leaders and members have always and everywhere more or less compromised with the ways of &#8220;the world.&#8221;  To what extent do we regard &#8220;Christian&#8221; or &#8220;Catholic&#8221; as not much more than the label of our tribe, a banner over our heads, as indeed the name of a personal style&#8211;as a signifier with at best a weak signification in the direction of taking up our cross and actually following Jesus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

