<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question to Ponder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/</link>
	<description>Catholic perspectives on culture, society, and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Nickol</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/#comment-51660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Nickol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=6499#comment-51660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the 1960s, when some on the left were staging protests against the Vietnam war (among other things), some on the right were fond of saying, &quot;America -- love it or leave it.&quot;  Maybe now the left should be saying it to the right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the 1960s, when some on the left were staging protests against the Vietnam war (among other things), some on the right were fond of saying, &#8220;America &#8212; love it or leave it.&#8221;  Maybe now the left should be saying it to the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Crosley</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/#comment-51658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George Crosley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=6499#comment-51658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Yet, that flag now STANDS for Obama, among other things. To honor the flag is to honor the president of the United States. Obama is president. To honor that flag is to honor Obama.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s pretty much the definition of fascistic thinking.

The flat doesn&#039;t stand for any politician. ANY. It stands for the nation. I guess the difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals identify the nation with its government while conservatives do not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yet, that flag now STANDS for Obama, among other things. To honor the flag is to honor the president of the United States. Obama is president. To honor that flag is to honor Obama.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty much the definition of fascistic thinking.</p>
<p>The flat doesn&#8217;t stand for any politician. ANY. It stands for the nation. I guess the difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals identify the nation with its government while conservatives do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Weatherbe</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/#comment-51619</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Weatherbe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=6499#comment-51619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question here seems to be one of degrees and is therefore a matter of prudential judgement for a university. If the United States is judged to be predominantly evil, then the university should be taking down the flag at the very minimum. But I think the U.S. represents many good things too, and its government does many good things. Does the good outweigh the bad? I think so. At a tactical level, a school could take down the flag on a particularly germane day to mourn the aborted unborn or the making of war in Iraq or whatever.
On the question raised about the use of the term &quot;genocide&quot; for abortion, it is at least appropriate when one considers the scale of the two events. And, as well, when one considers the implications for the birth rate in First and Second World countries, widespread abortion seems to mean these nations are self-destruction, or self-genociding. 
Ironically, I heard pro-lifers at the local public university accused of genocide recently: the group they are accused of attempting to exterminate: all women.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question here seems to be one of degrees and is therefore a matter of prudential judgement for a university. If the United States is judged to be predominantly evil, then the university should be taking down the flag at the very minimum. But I think the U.S. represents many good things too, and its government does many good things. Does the good outweigh the bad? I think so. At a tactical level, a school could take down the flag on a particularly germane day to mourn the aborted unborn or the making of war in Iraq or whatever.<br />
On the question raised about the use of the term &#8220;genocide&#8221; for abortion, it is at least appropriate when one considers the scale of the two events. And, as well, when one considers the implications for the birth rate in First and Second World countries, widespread abortion seems to mean these nations are self-destruction, or self-genociding.<br />
Ironically, I heard pro-lifers at the local public university accused of genocide recently: the group they are accused of attempting to exterminate: all women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/#comment-51614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=6499#comment-51614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess by now everyone has heard the sad news that yesterday the Greek Orthodox Church reversed its previous pro-life position.  It came as quite a shock to many.

Archbishop Demetrios, Primate of N. &amp; S. America for the Greek Orthodox Church attended festivities at the abortuary known as 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.  He clearly expressed support for the murder of innocents by bestowing honors on Barry H. Obama, handing him a certificate on behalf of the Orthodox “Church”.  He even called Obama &quot;Great&quot;.  

I am attempting to schedule a meeting with William Donohue of the Catholic League to coordinate a petition drive by faithful Catholics demanding that the Pope stop all ecumenical relations with the Greek Orthodox Church.  It would be a scandal if this &quot;archbishop,&quot; so tolerant of baby-killing, were to be invited to any Catholic facility.  If Donohue raises the issue of re-launching the 4th Crusade, I am willing to hear him out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess by now everyone has heard the sad news that yesterday the Greek Orthodox Church reversed its previous pro-life position.  It came as quite a shock to many.</p>
<p>Archbishop Demetrios, Primate of N. &amp; S. America for the Greek Orthodox Church attended festivities at the abortuary known as 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.  He clearly expressed support for the murder of innocents by bestowing honors on Barry H. Obama, handing him a certificate on behalf of the Orthodox “Church”.  He even called Obama &#8220;Great&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I am attempting to schedule a meeting with William Donohue of the Catholic League to coordinate a petition drive by faithful Catholics demanding that the Pope stop all ecumenical relations with the Greek Orthodox Church.  It would be a scandal if this &#8220;archbishop,&#8221; so tolerant of baby-killing, were to be invited to any Catholic facility.  If Donohue raises the issue of re-launching the 4th Crusade, I am willing to hear him out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captain4wkward</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/#comment-51610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[captain4wkward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=6499#comment-51610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[blah vablah blah

have you guys heard they&#039;re talking about advertising abortion on the teevee here in england?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blah vablah blah</p>
<p>have you guys heard they&#8217;re talking about advertising abortion on the teevee here in england?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Karlson</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/#comment-51566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry Karlson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=6499#comment-51566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MZ

Mark has banned me, deleted my posts, and misrepresented them before. But it&#039;s ok when he does it. But if Zippy is taken to task, not for a position, but for his childish inability to be accurate about the one he is insulting, then I am the bad one here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MZ</p>
<p>Mark has banned me, deleted my posts, and misrepresented them before. But it&#8217;s ok when he does it. But if Zippy is taken to task, not for a position, but for his childish inability to be accurate about the one he is insulting, then I am the bad one here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Karlson</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/#comment-51565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry Karlson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=6499#comment-51565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m on for 5 mins before I have to go.

Mark Shea, what a hypocrite: you have banned me on your blog and deleted my posts. Interesting is it not, what you say here and do otherwise?

More importantly, Zippy&#039;s continued behavior, which is never accurate in presenting the views and positions of others, went way beyond the call of duty in this thread, and properly earned his exile, when he has to continue to lie to make his point. He isn&#039;t into truth. Nor, Mark, are you. 

There you have it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on for 5 mins before I have to go.</p>
<p>Mark Shea, what a hypocrite: you have banned me on your blog and deleted my posts. Interesting is it not, what you say here and do otherwise?</p>
<p>More importantly, Zippy&#8217;s continued behavior, which is never accurate in presenting the views and positions of others, went way beyond the call of duty in this thread, and properly earned his exile, when he has to continue to lie to make his point. He isn&#8217;t into truth. Nor, Mark, are you. </p>
<p>There you have it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.Z.</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/#comment-51559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M.Z.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=6499#comment-51559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um Mark, you banned Zippy at one point.  When Zippy starts engaging in tantrums of name calling, I don&#039;t blame anyone for deleting his comments.  Whenever Zippy has had a substantive comment, it has been addressed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um Mark, you banned Zippy at one point.  When Zippy starts engaging in tantrums of name calling, I don&#8217;t blame anyone for deleting his comments.  Whenever Zippy has had a substantive comment, it has been addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shea</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/#comment-51558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Shea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=6499#comment-51558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my basic tests for the honesty of a site is whether the owners shout down a guy like Zippy and shut him up rather than engage him.  Vox Nova has just lost the last tatters of respect I once had for it.  The Coalition for Fog has undergone a reincarnation.  Welcome to the ideological echo chamber, Henry.  You and MM and the other excuse makers can spend the next four years making excuses for the inexcusable and calling it &quot;nuance&quot;.  You&#039;ve lost me as a reader.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my basic tests for the honesty of a site is whether the owners shout down a guy like Zippy and shut him up rather than engage him.  Vox Nova has just lost the last tatters of respect I once had for it.  The Coalition for Fog has undergone a reincarnation.  Welcome to the ideological echo chamber, Henry.  You and MM and the other excuse makers can spend the next four years making excuses for the inexcusable and calling it &#8220;nuance&#8221;.  You&#8217;ve lost me as a reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/#comment-51550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=6499#comment-51550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I am so looking forward to 80% of the ND student body, faculty, and guests at the commencement wildly cheering the President and 20% of them increasingly understood by the American public to be exactly the type of people they really are.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt;I’m glad popularity determines truth for you. It is very likely that many will cheer at ND.&lt;/b&gt;

I don&#039;t believe popularity determines truth.  I simply reject that it is a matter of &quot;truth&quot; that the President&#039;s speech at Notre Dame is statement of support for his abortion policy.  

Listen, we all win.  The students, faculty and guests will make a choice if they think the President is worthy of honor or not.  This adds to my side a substantial number of people, always helpful when we operate under a system of electoral democracy.  And for your side, it puts the hard-core, &quot;orthodox&quot; element more in control of the pro-life movement, advancing you and your fellow travelers into greater dominance of the movement.  Happiness all around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I am so looking forward to 80% of the ND student body, faculty, and guests at the commencement wildly cheering the President and 20% of them increasingly understood by the American public to be exactly the type of people they really are.</i></p>
<p><b>I’m glad popularity determines truth for you. It is very likely that many will cheer at ND.</b></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe popularity determines truth.  I simply reject that it is a matter of &#8220;truth&#8221; that the President&#8217;s speech at Notre Dame is statement of support for his abortion policy.  </p>
<p>Listen, we all win.  The students, faculty and guests will make a choice if they think the President is worthy of honor or not.  This adds to my side a substantial number of people, always helpful when we operate under a system of electoral democracy.  And for your side, it puts the hard-core, &#8220;orthodox&#8221; element more in control of the pro-life movement, advancing you and your fellow travelers into greater dominance of the movement.  Happiness all around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Henry</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/#comment-51544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Henry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=6499#comment-51544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Henry,

I did not say he was pro-abortion. I said he was pro-choice. Being pro-choice simply means a person currently opposes legal restrictions on abortion. The question of why he is pro-choice is another matter. But to deny that the position outlined above is pro-choice, is to alter the meaning of the word in the manner of Humpty Dumpty (if we&#039;re doing literary references): 

&#039;When I use a word,&#039; Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,&#039; it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less.&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry,</p>
<p>I did not say he was pro-abortion. I said he was pro-choice. Being pro-choice simply means a person currently opposes legal restrictions on abortion. The question of why he is pro-choice is another matter. But to deny that the position outlined above is pro-choice, is to alter the meaning of the word in the manner of Humpty Dumpty (if we&#8217;re doing literary references): </p>
<p>&#8216;When I use a word,&#8217; Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,&#8217; it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Karlson</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2009/03/25/question-to-ponder-7/#comment-51542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry Karlson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/?p=6499#comment-51542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Henry

That is not exactly Gerald&#039;s position. Even if he were pro choice, that would not make him pro-abortion, or not against it. Remember that. However, he is not pro choice. He has said many times what his position is, and it is more complex than a simple gotcha with him. His point is that at this point in time, the United States just can&#039;t immediately go from where we are to the forceful laws against abortion; to do so would do violence to the system  and indeed requires a tyrannical use of force (Tolkien connection: why Galadriel and Gandalf avoid the Ring, though they would do good). In this way he has said the thing is to prepare the people to get them against abortion themselves, which is better; it is better to have no laws and no abortion and laws with abortion constantly going on despite the laws (which he believes would happen). Which again is why it is about method to the end, not the end itself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Henry</p>
<p>That is not exactly Gerald&#8217;s position. Even if he were pro choice, that would not make him pro-abortion, or not against it. Remember that. However, he is not pro choice. He has said many times what his position is, and it is more complex than a simple gotcha with him. His point is that at this point in time, the United States just can&#8217;t immediately go from where we are to the forceful laws against abortion; to do so would do violence to the system  and indeed requires a tyrannical use of force (Tolkien connection: why Galadriel and Gandalf avoid the Ring, though they would do good). In this way he has said the thing is to prepare the people to get them against abortion themselves, which is better; it is better to have no laws and no abortion and laws with abortion constantly going on despite the laws (which he believes would happen). Which again is why it is about method to the end, not the end itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

