<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chomsky on the U.S. political system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vox-nova.com/2008/10/11/chomsky-on-the-us-political-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/10/11/chomsky-on-the-us-political-system/</link>
	<description>Catholic perspectives on culture, society, and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chomsky on the &#8216;08 presidential election &#171; Vox Nova</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/10/11/chomsky-on-the-us-political-system/#comment-40658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chomsky on the &#8216;08 presidential election &#171; Vox Nova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=4523#comment-40658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  Click here for a video interview with Noam Chomsky on the presidential election. While he has argued for years that the political system of the united states has one party &#8212; the Business Party [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Click here for a video interview with Noam Chomsky on the presidential election. While he has argued for years that the political system of the united states has one party &#8212; the Business Party [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catholicanarchy.org™ &#187; More from Chomsky on the &#8216;08 presidential election</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/10/11/chomsky-on-the-us-political-system/#comment-40656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[catholicanarchy.org™ &#187; More from Chomsky on the &#8216;08 presidential election]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=4523#comment-40656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] here for a video interview with Noam Chomsky on the presidential election. While he has argued for years that the political system of the united states has one party &#8212; the Business Party [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here for a video interview with Noam Chomsky on the presidential election. While he has argued for years that the political system of the united states has one party &#8212; the Business Party [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macphisto</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/10/11/chomsky-on-the-us-political-system/#comment-39714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Macphisto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=4523#comment-39714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though I don&#039;t know that I can agree with Chomsky on very much, I certainly can agree that successful social welfare battles have begun from the ground and worked their way up and not the other way around. It has been said somewhere else on this blog that regardless of who is elected president the pro-life movement will still have to be lived and spread by individuals and smaller societies.  Our culture needs to change, and while laws have an influence on culture, culture is not reduceable to law.   We, you and I, need to change culture...and pay attention to who we vote for in the legislature and not just the executive branch.

I disagree that Obama seems to be more open to such movements from the grassroots (as was said somewhere else on this blog), and I find highly suspect any statistical claim that &quot;real income&quot; whatever that might mean for the statistician, has risen &quot;under Democrats&quot; moreso than &quot;under Republicans,&quot; whatever &quot;under&quot; means.  Does it mean under Democratic presidents? Or Democratic presidents and congresses? Or just Democratic congresses? The quote is meaningless and its use by Chomsky resembles the way a drunk uses a lamp post, i.e. for support rather than for enlightenment.

Still, as I say, our little deaths to ourselves and our efforts to aid the conversions of our neighbors is a task imperative regardless whether McCain or Obama or Barr wins.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I don&#8217;t know that I can agree with Chomsky on very much, I certainly can agree that successful social welfare battles have begun from the ground and worked their way up and not the other way around. It has been said somewhere else on this blog that regardless of who is elected president the pro-life movement will still have to be lived and spread by individuals and smaller societies.  Our culture needs to change, and while laws have an influence on culture, culture is not reduceable to law.   We, you and I, need to change culture&#8230;and pay attention to who we vote for in the legislature and not just the executive branch.</p>
<p>I disagree that Obama seems to be more open to such movements from the grassroots (as was said somewhere else on this blog), and I find highly suspect any statistical claim that &#8220;real income&#8221; whatever that might mean for the statistician, has risen &#8220;under Democrats&#8221; moreso than &#8220;under Republicans,&#8221; whatever &#8220;under&#8221; means.  Does it mean under Democratic presidents? Or Democratic presidents and congresses? Or just Democratic congresses? The quote is meaningless and its use by Chomsky resembles the way a drunk uses a lamp post, i.e. for support rather than for enlightenment.</p>
<p>Still, as I say, our little deaths to ourselves and our efforts to aid the conversions of our neighbors is a task imperative regardless whether McCain or Obama or Barr wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/10/11/chomsky-on-the-us-political-system/#comment-39647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=4523#comment-39647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think what he is saying is don&#039;t get too excited about either candidate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what he is saying is don&#8217;t get too excited about either candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan O'Halloran, SJ</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/10/11/chomsky-on-the-us-political-system/#comment-39621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan O'Halloran, SJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=4523#comment-39621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

