<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review: Why the Democrats Are Blue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vox-nova.com/2008/06/29/book-review-why-the-democrats-are-blue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/06/29/book-review-why-the-democrats-are-blue/</link>
	<description>Catholic perspectives on culture, society, and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Follow up: Catholics and Democrats &#171; Vox Nova</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/06/29/book-review-why-the-democrats-are-blue/#comment-26727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Follow up: Catholics and Democrats &#171; Vox Nova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 04:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=2793#comment-26727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] up: Catholics and&#160;Democrats  In response to a previous post about his book, author Mark Stricherz makes the following points about Catholic voters and the Democratic [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up: Catholics and&nbsp;Democrats  In response to a previous post about his book, author Mark Stricherz makes the following points about Catholic voters and the Democratic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/06/29/book-review-why-the-democrats-are-blue/#comment-26387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=2793#comment-26387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just for the record, the delegate selection process has no quotas other than the equal division rule (between men and women).  The state parties are required to reach out to historically underrepresented groups, but are free to elect who they will (and certainly do).  Second, the superdelegates are in place in support of many of the goals the author identifies.  Members of the House and Senate, Governors, and big city mayors are automatic convention delegates, putting in place leaders who actually managed to run for office and win.  Many national union presidents are also superdelegates by virtue of being at-large members of the Democratic National Committee.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, the delegate selection process has no quotas other than the equal division rule (between men and women).  The state parties are required to reach out to historically underrepresented groups, but are free to elect who they will (and certainly do).  Second, the superdelegates are in place in support of many of the goals the author identifies.  Members of the House and Senate, Governors, and big city mayors are automatic convention delegates, putting in place leaders who actually managed to run for office and win.  Many national union presidents are also superdelegates by virtue of being at-large members of the Democratic National Committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/06/29/book-review-why-the-democrats-are-blue/#comment-26365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=2793#comment-26365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I have no doubt they will break heavily for Obama, but how many will vote? &lt;/i&gt;

You asked a question, I answered it.  You didn&#039;t like the answer so you call it &quot;weak&quot; and &quot;partisan&quot; as if to slay the messenger.  Maybe the statistics from 1960 are more interesting or comforting to you but I live in the present.  

&lt;i&gt;Whatever going back to FDR, they matter as a voting bloc now and going forward even more so.&lt;/i&gt; 

&quot;flat out wrong&quot;?  You are in denial brother.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I have no doubt they will break heavily for Obama, but how many will vote? </i></p>
<p>You asked a question, I answered it.  You didn&#8217;t like the answer so you call it &#8220;weak&#8221; and &#8220;partisan&#8221; as if to slay the messenger.  Maybe the statistics from 1960 are more interesting or comforting to you but I live in the present.  </p>
<p><i>Whatever going back to FDR, they matter as a voting bloc now and going forward even more so.</i> </p>
<p>&#8220;flat out wrong&#8221;?  You are in denial brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathanjones02</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/06/29/book-review-why-the-democrats-are-blue/#comment-26360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonathanjones02]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=2793#comment-26360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are arguing a point completely irrelevant to the book and the review. And outside of south Florida and south Texas (one of two places where &quot;votes&quot; were mined in 1960) this statement is flat out wrong: &quot;Whatever going back to FDR, they matter as a voting bloc&quot;

There is no need for arguing a straw man point so as to make a larger partisan point. It&#039;s weak.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are arguing a point completely irrelevant to the book and the review. And outside of south Florida and south Texas (one of two places where &#8220;votes&#8221; were mined in 1960) this statement is flat out wrong: &#8220;Whatever going back to FDR, they matter as a voting bloc&#8221;</p>
<p>There is no need for arguing a straw man point so as to make a larger partisan point. It&#8217;s weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/06/29/book-review-why-the-democrats-are-blue/#comment-26356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=2793#comment-26356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;That will not be true in the future, but from FDR to 2004 &lt;i&gt;Hispanics don’t matter much as a voting group, so no “whistling past the graveyard.”&lt;/i&gt;

Whatever going back to FDR, they matter as a voting bloc now and going forward even more so.  Unfortunately for McCain since he was a voice of moderation on illegal immigration, it appears they blame the Republican party for most of the anti-immigrant rhetoric and will punish McCain for that at the polls, right or wrong.  You will see a large Hispanic turnout in Nov and that will be a major motivator, guaranteed. It will also impact the final numbers on the Catholic vote.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That will not be true in the future, but from FDR to 2004 <i>Hispanics don’t matter much as a voting group, so no “whistling past the graveyard.”</i></p>
<p>Whatever going back to FDR, they matter as a voting bloc now and going forward even more so.  Unfortunately for McCain since he was a voice of moderation on illegal immigration, it appears they blame the Republican party for most of the anti-immigrant rhetoric and will punish McCain for that at the polls, right or wrong.  You will see a large Hispanic turnout in Nov and that will be a major motivator, guaranteed. It will also impact the final numbers on the Catholic vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark DeFrancisis</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/06/29/book-review-why-the-democrats-are-blue/#comment-26352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark DeFrancisis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=2793#comment-26352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This book sounds like a &#039;reverse&#039;  spinoff of Thomas Frank&#039;s &quot;What&#039;s the Matter with Kansas?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book sounds like a &#8216;reverse&#8217;  spinoff of Thomas Frank&#8217;s &#8220;What&#8217;s the Matter with Kansas?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathanjones02</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/06/29/book-review-why-the-democrats-are-blue/#comment-26351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonathanjones02]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=2793#comment-26351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael,

&quot;Hispanics are breaking heavily for Obama which will give him the Catholic vote this year by a couple pts.&quot;

Maybe. I have no doubt they will break heavily for Obama, but how many will vote? The numbers are always lower, sometimes significantly, than their (estimated) percentage of the population. Look at the numbers out of California. That will not be true in the future, but from FDR to 2004 Hispanics don&#039;t matter much as a voting group, so no &quot;whistling past the graveyard.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>&#8220;Hispanics are breaking heavily for Obama which will give him the Catholic vote this year by a couple pts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe. I have no doubt they will break heavily for Obama, but how many will vote? The numbers are always lower, sometimes significantly, than their (estimated) percentage of the population. Look at the numbers out of California. That will not be true in the future, but from FDR to 2004 Hispanics don&#8217;t matter much as a voting group, so no &#8220;whistling past the graveyard.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/06/29/book-review-why-the-democrats-are-blue/#comment-26350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=2793#comment-26350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like you&#039;re whistling past the graveyard.  Hispanics are breaking heavily for Obama which will give him the Catholic vote this year by a couple pts.

June Gallup Results:

Among major U.S. religious groups, Catholic voters are most closely divided in their presidential voting preferences, with Barack Obama holding a narrow 47% to 43% advantage over John McCain. McCain leads Obama among Protestants (48% to 41%) and Mormons (70% to 23%) while Obama holds the upper hand among Jewish voters (62% to 29%) and those with no religious affiliation (65% to 25%).

These results are based on aggregated Gallup Poll Daily tracking data from June 5-23, with all 14,000+ interviews conducted after Hillary Clinton decided to end her presidential bid. During this time, Obama averaged a 46% to 43% lead over McCain among all registered voters.

Catholics have traditionally been a key swing-voter group, and the 2008 election is proving to be no exception. Since Gallup began tracking general-election voting preferences in early March, the largest advantage either candidate has had among Catholics in any given week has been only five percentage points.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like you&#8217;re whistling past the graveyard.  Hispanics are breaking heavily for Obama which will give him the Catholic vote this year by a couple pts.</p>
<p>June Gallup Results:</p>
<p>Among major U.S. religious groups, Catholic voters are most closely divided in their presidential voting preferences, with Barack Obama holding a narrow 47% to 43% advantage over John McCain. McCain leads Obama among Protestants (48% to 41%) and Mormons (70% to 23%) while Obama holds the upper hand among Jewish voters (62% to 29%) and those with no religious affiliation (65% to 25%).</p>
<p>These results are based on aggregated Gallup Poll Daily tracking data from June 5-23, with all 14,000+ interviews conducted after Hillary Clinton decided to end her presidential bid. During this time, Obama averaged a 46% to 43% lead over McCain among all registered voters.</p>
<p>Catholics have traditionally been a key swing-voter group, and the 2008 election is proving to be no exception. Since Gallup began tracking general-election voting preferences in early March, the largest advantage either candidate has had among Catholics in any given week has been only five percentage points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jh</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2008/06/29/book-review-why-the-democrats-are-blue/#comment-26349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxnova2.wordpress.com/?p=2793#comment-26349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the degate quota system has caused real problems in the Dem I very much agree with that]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the degate quota system has caused real problems in the Dem I very much agree with that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

