Skip to content

“Descended into Hell” — Exploring God’s silence

March 22, 2008

This article of the Apostle’s Creed is certainly by far the most controversial for many Christians, but why? At first, it is hard to believe that the Son of God who is sinless would descend into hell, which we understand it to be a place where there is only pain and suffering.

As this can be a topic of deep theological discussions, I only attempt here to scratch the surface based on Joseph Ratzinger’s Introduction to Christianity and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

The “Death of God”
In reality, even though as Christians we believe in the mystery of the resurrection, we may not feel as comfortable in accepting the fact that for the resurrection to be possible, Jesus had to experience death in the same way that all men do. The mystery of our faith is based in the reality that Jesus Christ in fact died; however, this was not an ordinary death. Jesus Christ as the Redeemer, descended into hell in a special way in order to proclaim “the Good News to the spirits imprisoned there.”[1]

Sheol, Hell, and Death
Scholars claim that the word “hell” in this article of the Creed may be a false translation of the word sheol, which meant in the Old Testament a state after death characterized by nothingness. Pope Benedict XVI, in his book Introduction to Christianity, challenges this interpretation of “hell”, which only implies that Jesus died, and inquires further into the meaning of hell and death.


It is in our human nature to be afraid of loneliness. According to the Pope, if we face certain situations, such as being alone in the presence of a corpse, for instance, we will become afraid of the body even though we are aware that we will not get hurt by it. However, if someone else would be in the room with us, our fears would go away, because we would no longer be alone faced with death.

Because we enter into death by ourselves with no one accompanying us, death is also considered as utter loneliness under the Old Testament definition of sheol. This is why the Pope defines death as “absolute loneliness,” but goes further into saying that hell is “death into which love cannot longer reach.” [2]

Christ Conquers Death
Jesus also experienced this loneliness leading up to His death when He cried for the Father: “My God why have you forsaken me?”[3] Subsequently, because prior to the Incarnation, death or the state after death (sheol) was considered as complete loneliness, it is important that Christ’s death would differ from this earlier idea. He descended into hell, our final loneliness, and opened its gates to reach us with His love. When Christ died, death and hell no longer meant the same thing, because from that point on love resided in death.

“Since this love-death of our Lord, death has taken on a quite different meaning; it can become for us an expression of our purest and most living love, assuming that we take it as a conferred opportunity to give ourselves unreservedly into the hands of God” [4]

Scripture and other non Biblical References for Personal Study

Mt 27:52; Mt 12:40; Acts 2:27, 31;Rom 10:7; Eph 4:9; 1 Pet 3:19ff, 4:6
Catechism of the Catholic Church, 632-637
Joseph Ratzinger, Introduction to Christianity
Johann Auer and Joseph Ratzinger, Eschatology: Death and Eternal Life
Hans Urs Von Balthasar, Credo

[1] Catechism of the Catholic Church, 678.
[2] Joseph Ratzinger, Introduction to Christianity (San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1990), 227
[3] Mk 15:34
[4] Hans Urs Von Balthasar, Credo (San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2005), 54.

4 Comments
  1. March 22, 2008 3:25 pm

    Holy Saturday has so many themes, but one of the most important is indeed the silence of the Word of God, and with it, a confirmation that “God is dead, and we killed him.” It’s a difficult day to grasp, and theologically, it will always remain a mystery. Yet this is the point — death is a mystery, and the dead (for the most part) remain silent. Jesus, going to the dead, will be silent to us with what happened — though we know “aspects” of it, and we can discuss it theologically, the underlying silence must always be kept.

    Originally, to get to that point, I thought of doing my Holy Saturday post with three blank lines and nothing else. There is merit to that. But I didn’t think most people would appreciate it, and they might even think something is wrong with their computer. The post of the icon of the dead Christ being put into the tomb, without any words, was the best I could do. But of course, for us, reflecting upon it, words are necessary. And you have done a good job with it.

    Being one who wants to gain as much as I can from Balthasar, I understand there are big issues when one looks to his theology of Holy Saturday with the Eastern tradition. Ultimately, I think they are both true and reflecting upon the day in different ways; but to get that complementary nature out is difficult (Balthasar himself, of course, tried, but one can tell he had trouble with an aspect of tradition for Holy Saturday; I don’t view it as a fault as some do as much as a reminder of the side we normally don’t reflect upon, and the two come together via Chalcedon).

  2. radicalcatholicmom permalink*
    March 22, 2008 4:47 pm

    WOW! Wow. I had never thought about this before. Thank you.

  3. Mark DeFrancisis permalink*
    March 22, 2008 5:00 pm

    God-forsaken-ness enters into the communio that is God, as the dramatic, fullest expression for us humans of the love that is divine…

  4. jimklasz permalink
    March 23, 2008 5:24 pm

    as in Donne’s poem above “….and Death thou shalt die”

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 173 other followers