Expansive? Perhaps. Poor? According to whom? That’s a value judgment that you merely assert. Convince me its poor by appealing to the original intent of the authors, not to your own ideological bent.

2. Apparently Ron Paul has hit a nerve with birth right citizenship issue. Mr. Huckabee is now stealing a page from his playbook.
http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080108/NATION/311698216/1001

3. Finally, I like Dr. Paul supported Ronald Reagan in 1976 when Reagan was considered a wacko extremist that was unelectable, and he was opposed by all the mainstream establishment Republicans. I was overjoyed when he was elected president. But, the joy quickly turned into disappointment. He did not do what he promised. The Department of Education stayed, buearocracy and the federal government grew (although at a slower pace), and pro-abortion justices were named to the supreme court. Was Reagan evil – no, I think he was a good man, but I think he was not up to the fight and achieved little if anything during his presidency.

Half a truth is often a great lie.

Most sincerely,
Benjamin Franklin

Why is it abuse? The law is the law. Unless you want to amend the Constitution to make one’s parent’s own citizenship a condition for U.S. citizenship, which affects many more people. Under the current criteria for U.S. citizenship, children born of undocumented migrants have the same rights and privileges as all children born in the United States.

According to this story, Clinton sent out a mailing (which I suppose is an ad) attacking Obama for not being pro-abortion enough. Obama responded with recorded phone calls (I don’t know whether that constitutes an ad or not) bragging on his “… 100 percent pro-choice record …”

Illegal aliens are abusing the 14th Amendment to get their “birthright citizenship” and it is something to which they AND their unborn are NOT ENTITLED. Americans are tired of paying for the millions of illegal aliens to have their babies at our expense. No it is not the fault of the baby in the womb or the 11 year old dragged across the border. That fault lies squarely with the PARENTS of that child who chose to put the life of that child in danger for a “better life” at the expense of American taxpayers. It is the sole responsibility of the illegal alien parents to NOT teach their children to break laws and take what they want even if it is wrong. They are raising a generation of anchor babies who have no respect for the laws of the United States. The same anchor babies have allegiance to Mexico or their “mother country” even though they continue to benefit from services and free education provided by American taxpayers.

If they care so much about their “mother country” such as Mexico, why don’t they work toward making that country change to improve their lives without having to come to America? America is NOT a lifeboat that is required to give everyone who wants it a better life. We need to take care of AMERICANS and let the people from other countries work for change in their own countries. Instead they come to OUR country and expect us to bend over backwards for them. Ridiculous!

With that being said – it is the policies of the US government regarding NAFTA and other “free trade” agreements that have created this imbalance. The people of the US didn’t want this. It is the elitists and the globalists who wanted this and we are ALL victims of that cartel of business people and bankers who wish to create a one world class of consumer slaves and eliminate the middle class which made this country great.

The globalists and elitists are the real enemy here. They are the enemy of Americans as much as they are the enemy of poor Mexicans. The elitists care not about decimating the good life that most Americans used to have in order to create their one world slave class of consumers who just buy disposable CRAP from China and work two jobs just trying to make ends meet.

We are on the verge of American Revolution II. Be part of the solution not part of the problem.

Thanks for the link. Michael and I were actually talking about this the other night, because Republicans were attacking each other on their record on executions, immigration, etc. ,and I was wondering whether Democrats did the same about abortion. Although they don’t do it in public debates or ads, do they? I haven’t seen that yet.

I assumed that “tax subsidies for illegal immigrants” referred to his wanting to give illegal immigrants in-state tuition. What makes you think it refers to prenatal care specifically?