CNN and FoxNews are calling the Wyoming GOP Caucus for Mitt Romney. Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter appear to be heading for second and third, respectively.
Hey, Wyoming…despite the anemic media coverage, Vox Nova still loves you!
Wyoming is irrelevant, but it shouldn’t be. Iowa and New Hampshire get way too much exposure, to the detriment of other states like Wyoming. Besides, any state that gave us Al Simpson and Dick Cheney is fine by me.
I stumbled across your blog. I am a republican blogger myself.
I don’t know if it really needs to be said, but here goes. Iowa is significant because it is a bellwether for close to 50 electoral votes. New Hampshire is a bellwether for another 50 electoral votes. Wyoming is indicative of Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho. I have nothing against those States, but it is more than just coincidence that Iowa and New Hampshire have significance.
I would really interested to hear Vox Nova contributors discuss the Democratic candidates (particularly Clinton and Obama) compete with each other to declare who is the most supportive of abortion rights.
How can one even consider Dems as candidates when for them being pro-abortion is a non-negotiable?
Though I don’t know if any of the contributors at Vox Nova are that interested in comparing abortion support among definitively pro-choice candidates, just as I am not sure whether any contributor intends to vote for any of these candidates, I do know that abortion rights seems to be a rather minor part of the Obama and Clinton platforms.
Ed, if you go to Feministing.com, they do an outstanding job of focusing on who is most supportive of abortion on the Dem side. For the record, they cannot stand Hillary.
Wyoming is irrelevant, but it shouldn’t be. Iowa and New Hampshire get way too much exposure, to the detriment of other states like Wyoming. Besides, any state that gave us Al Simpson and Dick Cheney is fine by me.
I stumbled across your blog. I am a republican blogger myself.
I would like you to check out my blog http://www.blacktygrrrr.wordpress.com
It is “The Tygrrrr Express.” I hope you enjoy reading my blog as much as I enjoy writing it.
eric aka the Tygrrrr Express.
P.S. If you would like to do a link exchange, I get some pretty decent traffic.
I don’t know if it really needs to be said, but here goes. Iowa is significant because it is a bellwether for close to 50 electoral votes. New Hampshire is a bellwether for another 50 electoral votes. Wyoming is indicative of Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho. I have nothing against those States, but it is more than just coincidence that Iowa and New Hampshire have significance.
I would really interested to hear Vox Nova contributors discuss the Democratic candidates (particularly Clinton and Obama) compete with each other to declare who is the most supportive of abortion rights.
How can one even consider Dems as candidates when for them being pro-abortion is a non-negotiable?
Ed,
Though I don’t know if any of the contributors at Vox Nova are that interested in comparing abortion support among definitively pro-choice candidates, just as I am not sure whether any contributor intends to vote for any of these candidates, I do know that abortion rights seems to be a rather minor part of the Obama and Clinton platforms.
Romney is now ahead in the delegate count, btw:
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P08/
” I do know that abortion rights seems to be a rather minor part of the Obama and Clinton platforms”
Hmmm. Someone needs to tell Mrs. Clinton that.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5ip2G-tP8Bkle1aHygW4mJQOT5FrQD8U01RF83
Ed, if you go to Feministing.com, they do an outstanding job of focusing on who is most supportive of abortion on the Dem side. For the record, they cannot stand Hillary.