<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Waterboarding&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/</link>
	<description>Catholic perspectives on culture, society, and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:31:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on Bush&#8217;s Torture Regime &#171; Vox Nova</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-26779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More on Bush&#8217;s Torture Regime &#171; Vox Nova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-26779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  We&#8217;ve discussed before how incredibly awful the waterboarding torture technique truly is. As Malcolm Nance&#8211; former master instructor and chief of training at the U.S. Navy Survival, Evasion, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  We&#8217;ve discussed before how incredibly awful the waterboarding torture technique truly is. As Malcolm Nance&#8211; former master instructor and chief of training at the U.S. Navy Survival, Evasion, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vetoes of Evil &#171; Vox Nova</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-15197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vetoes of Evil &#171; Vox Nova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-15197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] than his predecessor or his political opponents. For this veto amounts to an embrace of a hideous act, an intrinsically evil act, on the basest of consequentualist reasoning. And remember: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than his predecessor or his political opponents. For this veto amounts to an embrace of a hideous act, an intrinsically evil act, on the basest of consequentualist reasoning. And remember: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White House: Waterboarding is Legal &#171; Vox Nova</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-11267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[White House: Waterboarding is Legal &#171; Vox Nova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-11267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] torture technique in &#8220;extraordinary circumstances&#8221;. A quick reminder on what exactly waterboarding is. An a quick reminder also that it is an intrinsically evil act, which means in is evil in ordinary [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] torture technique in &#8220;extraordinary circumstances&#8221;. A quick reminder on what exactly waterboarding is. An a quick reminder also that it is an intrinsically evil act, which means in is evil in ordinary [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterboarding &#8220;would be torture&#8221; &#171; Vox Nova</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-9027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Waterboarding &#8220;would be torture&#8221; &#171; Vox Nova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-9027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mukasey, as Morning&#8217;s Minion reminded us, is a bit more vague on the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mukasey, as Morning&#8217;s Minion reminded us, is a bit more vague on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: National Review is Pro-Torture &#171; Vox Nova</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-4144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[National Review is Pro-Torture &#171; Vox Nova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-4144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] interrogation techniques&#8221;) but it doesn&#8217;t make what is going on any less evil. I linked recently to a post by Malcolm Nance, a former SERE master instructor and chief of training. Nance dispels [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interrogation techniques&#8221;) but it doesn&#8217;t make what is going on any less evil. I linked recently to a post by Malcolm Nance, a former SERE master instructor and chief of training. Nance dispels [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald R. McClarey</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald R. McClarey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Donald: 

I’m sorry, but you seriously need a spine implant.

Seriously.&quot;

And Matt I think you need a brain implant.  Seriously.  Now that we have exchanged obligatory insults, let&#039;s talk.  I was describing the position of Clinton above.  My own position, repeated ad nauseum on this blog and other blogs, is that I am opposed to physical coercion interrogation techniques.  I include in this category waterboarding.  If I were in the Senate I would support legislation banning this technique.  I also believe that any politician or party supporting such legislation will pay a very heavy price when an American city is attacked with a nuclear device, something that I anticipate happening in the next decade.  I doubt if waterboarding and other physical interrogation techniques can stop this, but I also doubt that the American people will be in a mood to draw nice distinctions in the wake of a tragedy that leaves several hundred thousand Americans dead.  Clinton is bright enough to understand this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Donald: </p>
<p>I’m sorry, but you seriously need a spine implant.</p>
<p>Seriously.&#8221;</p>
<p>And Matt I think you need a brain implant.  Seriously.  Now that we have exchanged obligatory insults, let&#8217;s talk.  I was describing the position of Clinton above.  My own position, repeated ad nauseum on this blog and other blogs, is that I am opposed to physical coercion interrogation techniques.  I include in this category waterboarding.  If I were in the Senate I would support legislation banning this technique.  I also believe that any politician or party supporting such legislation will pay a very heavy price when an American city is attacked with a nuclear device, something that I anticipate happening in the next decade.  I doubt if waterboarding and other physical interrogation techniques can stop this, but I also doubt that the American people will be in a mood to draw nice distinctions in the wake of a tragedy that leaves several hundred thousand Americans dead.  Clinton is bright enough to understand this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, that was a joke.  Unless you think that what Islam did from the seventh century on to Europe justifies anything we do against them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, that was a joke.  Unless you think that what Islam did from the seventh century on to Europe justifies anything we do against them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arewak</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arewak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly, Phillip. Therefore, why try to bitch and demonize the &#039;mullahs&#039; who feel they are doing exactly the same?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, Phillip. Therefore, why try to bitch and demonize the &#8216;mullahs&#8217; who feel they are doing exactly the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Talbot</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Talbot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald: 

I&#039;m sorry, but you seriously need a spine implant.

Seriously.

Landsakes, man. Have you no courage?  What is this desperation for the government to torture the big, bad terrorists before they do something mean to you? You&#039;re giving the terrorists way, WAY more power...more &lt;i&gt;attention&lt;/i&gt;, even... than they deserve. 

Think about this, Donald: Why is it called &quot;TERRORism&quot;?? Forget moral considerations for a moment. Don&#039;t you realize that when you beg the government to stop at no means, no matter how vile and subversive of democracy and human decency, to save your sorry, fear-addled hide -  &quot;I&#039;m scared! Trash the constitution! Take away my rights! Do anything, but don&#039;t let them hurt meeee!&quot; - you&#039;re actually &lt;i&gt;doing exactly what the terrorists want you to do?&lt;/i&gt; Why are you helping the terrorists?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald: </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but you seriously need a spine implant.</p>
<p>Seriously.</p>
<p>Landsakes, man. Have you no courage?  What is this desperation for the government to torture the big, bad terrorists before they do something mean to you? You&#8217;re giving the terrorists way, WAY more power&#8230;more <i>attention</i>, even&#8230; than they deserve. </p>
<p>Think about this, Donald: Why is it called &#8220;TERRORism&#8221;?? Forget moral considerations for a moment. Don&#8217;t you realize that when you beg the government to stop at no means, no matter how vile and subversive of democracy and human decency, to save your sorry, fear-addled hide &#8211;  &#8220;I&#8217;m scared! Trash the constitution! Take away my rights! Do anything, but don&#8217;t let them hurt meeee!&#8221; &#8211; you&#8217;re actually <i>doing exactly what the terrorists want you to do?</i> Why are you helping the terrorists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald R. McClarey</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald R. McClarey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The answer to my question above is Mrs. Clinton.  I agree with her on very little but I do admire her usual shrewdness.  She has long been weasel worded in her comments on torture:

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/10/clinton-and-tor.html

Clinton expects to be the next president, and she isn&#039;t about to give away any tool that she might find useful in waging war.  In some ways she is a throwback to the liberal hawks so common in the Democrat party prior to Vietnam, and anyone who doesn&#039;t believe that she would be ruthless in doing whatever it took to achieve victory simply hasn&#039;t been paying close attention to her statements


.http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/10/10/ap_interview_obama_criticizes_clinton_war_torture_stances/


Clinton also realizes  that if her party were to ban waterboarding a terrible political price could well be paid after a big terrorist attack that causes mass casualties in the US.  It is one thing to yell at the Bush administration, rake their hapless AG nominee over the coals,  score political points with their base and generally have a good time.  It is another to actually pass legislation and assume responsibility for the consequences.  As Rudyard Kipling noted, &quot;Power without responsibility - the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages.&quot;  

As a student of skillful political manuevers, I tip my hat to Mrs.  Clinton.  She is playing her political cards well in this case, if not ethically.  Or perhpas she is merely taking advice from her cheatin&#039; half.  I have always thought that she was far brighter than him, but I also thought he had the best raw political talent since Reagan left office.
http://infowars.net/articles/october2007/011007Clinton.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer to my question above is Mrs. Clinton.  I agree with her on very little but I do admire her usual shrewdness.  She has long been weasel worded in her comments on torture:</p>
<p><a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/10/clinton-and-tor.html" rel="nofollow">http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/10/clinton-and-tor.html</a></p>
<p>Clinton expects to be the next president, and she isn&#8217;t about to give away any tool that she might find useful in waging war.  In some ways she is a throwback to the liberal hawks so common in the Democrat party prior to Vietnam, and anyone who doesn&#8217;t believe that she would be ruthless in doing whatever it took to achieve victory simply hasn&#8217;t been paying close attention to her statements</p>
<p>.<a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/10/10/ap_interview_obama_criticizes_clinton_war_torture_stances/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/10/10/ap_interview_obama_criticizes_clinton_war_torture_stances/</a></p>
<p>Clinton also realizes  that if her party were to ban waterboarding a terrible political price could well be paid after a big terrorist attack that causes mass casualties in the US.  It is one thing to yell at the Bush administration, rake their hapless AG nominee over the coals,  score political points with their base and generally have a good time.  It is another to actually pass legislation and assume responsibility for the consequences.  As Rudyard Kipling noted, &#8220;Power without responsibility &#8211; the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages.&#8221;  </p>
<p>As a student of skillful political manuevers, I tip my hat to Mrs.  Clinton.  She is playing her political cards well in this case, if not ethically.  Or perhpas she is merely taking advice from her cheatin&#8217; half.  I have always thought that she was far brighter than him, but I also thought he had the best raw political talent since Reagan left office.<br />
<a href="http://infowars.net/articles/october2007/011007Clinton.htm" rel="nofollow">http://infowars.net/articles/october2007/011007Clinton.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also have a grudge against Islam, as that it invaded the country of my ancestors and committed grave evils.  So I guess I can approve of a war against them.  Right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have a grudge against Islam, as that it invaded the country of my ancestors and committed grave evils.  So I guess I can approve of a war against them.  Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arewak</title>
		<link>http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arewak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vox-nova.com/2007/10/31/on-waterboarding/#comment-3857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are people always surprised by evil emanating from this accursed nation? Yeah, this is one more evidence of an evil presidency, but does anyone pause to think that it came into effect because people voted(however flawed)? These guys shouldn&#039;t have had enough votes to even talk about a recount. 

This is probably the only time I have agreed with Donald on anything, but he is right: what is Congress doing to reel this in? Democrats? The answer is that politics of fear is very much potent - nobody (especially Democrats) want to be labelled a surrender monkey. When people continue to vote out of fear then the politicians will be blindingly dense to stand on principle with regards to waterboarding, rendition, Blackwater, etc. 

Bin laden gave his reason for targeting American civilians and it was dismissed as the rantings of a genocidal maniac, but his point is very much relevant: the American people have chosen a democratic system of government and are ultimately culpable for whatever perceived grudges that other nations have against the US government. No matter how much we are mired in denial, the government IS a reflection of American people and the choices made on election day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are people always surprised by evil emanating from this accursed nation? Yeah, this is one more evidence of an evil presidency, but does anyone pause to think that it came into effect because people voted(however flawed)? These guys shouldn&#8217;t have had enough votes to even talk about a recount. </p>
<p>This is probably the only time I have agreed with Donald on anything, but he is right: what is Congress doing to reel this in? Democrats? The answer is that politics of fear is very much potent &#8211; nobody (especially Democrats) want to be labelled a surrender monkey. When people continue to vote out of fear then the politicians will be blindingly dense to stand on principle with regards to waterboarding, rendition, Blackwater, etc. </p>
<p>Bin laden gave his reason for targeting American civilians and it was dismissed as the rantings of a genocidal maniac, but his point is very much relevant: the American people have chosen a democratic system of government and are ultimately culpable for whatever perceived grudges that other nations have against the US government. No matter how much we are mired in denial, the government IS a reflection of American people and the choices made on election day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

